Capitol Punishment in the United States is a very important issue. It is the execution of an individual and has been used for ages. Some claim it is fair payment for whatever crime warranted death. Others point out methods that are overly cruel and the executed may be innocent. The execution itself can be quite expensive depending on the method.
Supporters bring up several claims in favor of the death penalty. If you have been sentanced to die, you have commited a horrible crime against the public. In a country that values freedom, taking a life would require an act that we simply cant forgive. Murder, rapists, and other such acts warrant death. They also claim that killing the guilty person is cheaper in the long run then keeping him in a prison and feeding him with taxpayer money. In the case of rights to life, it can be said that by commiting a death-worthy crime you have lost the rights of society, and that death can only be paid in death. Simply killing them also ends any possibilty of the guilty escaping. It also frees up space in prison for less serious offenders. The promise of death is usually enough to keep normal people from commiting such crimes.
Opponents have their views. A society that decries murder cannot kill a person. Since the law that decided who dies is man made and so flawed, there is always an innocent who is executed. That tends to sour views of the law and the government that allowed the death. Methods of punishment, like the electric chair and hanging, are extremely painful and do not always kill the person. Failure means more cost and pain. Excessive use not only brings into question how many deserved it, but can also raise some disgust among the general public. As of September 2011, Texas has executed 1,226 people. While many of them may of deserved it, such a number brings into question the number of innocents caught in the web.
Capital punishment is needed. There are some people simply to dangerous to keep alive. Rapists, serial killers, child molesters, and such are all great dangers to the public. Many of them cannot be reformed. Killing them frees up space, saves money in the long term, and removes the threat for good. The victims and their families may also have peace of mind knowing the person who harmed them is gone for good. A firing squad would be my choice for exectuting people. The only person in Nevada to be executed by shot, Andriza Mircovich, was shot by a machine. Using a firing machine to execute the convict is better, it spares the firing squad and moral qualms they may have. When a person is convicted, they should be given a period in which they, under watch, will work to prove their innocence. This will hopefully reduce the number of innocents killed. Even then, capital punishment should only be used on the worst offenders and the unrepentant.
Facts:
1. As of September 21, 2011 Texas has executed 1,226 people.
2. The death penalty is given by humans, and therefor is flawed. Of a 1000 people executed, it is unknown how many were innocent.
3. How come life in prison doesn't mean life? Until it does, we're not ready to do away with the death penalty. Stop thinking in terms of "punishment" for a minute and think in terms of safeguarding innocent people from incorrigible murderers.
JESSE VENTURA, I Ain't Got Time to Bleed